Teaching Award

Self nomination by lecturers: Impact & Relevance

We are very pleased that you would like to play a part in highlighting and presenting outstanding teaching at the UASTW.

Please fill out the following form completely so that the jury can get the most accurate picture possible of the nominated course.

Information about the course

Title of the course *

Link to the course in CIS *

Link to the course in Moodle *

*By providing the link, I agree that members of the jury will receive reading rights in the Moodle course to assess the aspects presented below.

Information about the nominating lecturer(s)

I/We submit in the following function: development team lead(s), lecturer(s) *

*Only the people listed in the form can be awarded - unfortunately it is not possible to add contributors later.

Person 1

First Name *

Last Name *

UASTW-Email *

Person 2

First Name

Last Name

UASTW-Email

Person 3

First Name

Last Name

UASTW-Email

Person 4

First Name

Last Name

UASTW-Email

Person 5

First Name

Last Name

UASTW-Email

Category: Impact & Relevance

Category description In view of today's constantly changing world, it is important to address various topics of social interest within technically oriented courses and to ensure direct practical relevance. Various third mission aspects can be taken into account or promoted, if necessary also jointly, such as internationalization, diversity, sustainable development, etc: Internationalization, diversity, Sustainable Development Goals, digitalization, practical linking of research and teaching, cooperation with industry, etc.

The criteria by which the jury will judge the submissions in this category are as follows:

The measures implemented contribute to ensuring the direct applicability of what has been learned in real practice.
The measures implemented pursue the goal of overcoming current challenges more effectively and in accordance with the values, expectations and needs of society (as defined by RThe measures implemented promote economic thinking and action for the benefit of society.

Reasons for submission

Briefly describe the teaching/learning outcomes, the teaching/learning methods and the examination design over the course of the course. (max. 500 characters) *

Explain how you establish the connection between theoretical subject content and direct (business/science) practice. (max. 500 characters) *

*e.g. How are challenges relating to different environmental or cultural circumstances addressed? Are exemplary corporate practices cited to address (social) problems in different ways?

Explain to what extent the subject content is dealt with in relation to social values, expectations and needs. (max. 500 characters) *

*e.g. Is the economic viability of projects/procedures discussed in relation to social consequences? Are current practices raised that, for example, contradict the current state of research or supposedly ethical principles?

Explain how you promote economic thinking and action (against the background of social interests). (max. 500 characters) *

*e.g. How is independent, innovative thinking and problem solving made possible? To what extent are students given the opportunity to dedicate themselves to the topic of sustainability? Are they given the opportunity to experience themselves as responsible members of society, e.g. through practical collaborations?

LV-Evaluation results

Please upload screenshots of your evaluation results below. If you do not currently have any, 3-5 student endorsements can be uploaded in exceptional cases. *

I would like to upload the screenshots directly.I provide the screenshots via Cloudlink (Technikum Cloud, Dropbox etc.).

Your provided information will be treated confidentially and anonymized for the jury.

If you have any problems sending the form, please contact: teachingaward@technikum-wien.at!